funked posted 02-24-99 12:37 PM ET (US)
This is what made me think of the first question.
When I was a kid, I built a Monogram 1/48-scale radial-engined Fw 190
that came with a large assortment of rockets, bombs, and underwing gun pods
of 30mm calibre. I don't remember what build it represented (A, F, G).
I, of course, built it with every possible weapon mounted. It protected
my bedroom from intruders quite well before an unfortunate demise in testing
of a solid-fuel rocket propulsion system, A.K.A. bottle rockets.
What, if any, version of the Fw 190 carried all this stuff at once?
delta posted 02-24-99 03:11 PM ET (US)
Sorry I can't answer your 190 question, but ...
Could we have more details on the solid - rocket propulsion system tests?
Just what exactly were you up to? I used blacks cats myself to conduct
structural damage testing.
Inquiring minds want to know!!!
delta
Bino posted 02-24-99 04:58 PM ET (US)
Ask Doc Doom. Last time we got into a discussion here on AGW about the
various armament options on the 190, he was able to cite chapter and verse.
This is all I can find right now on the i-net: both the F and G variants
omitted the outboard 20mm cannons and retained the wing root 20mm cannons.
They could carry five bombs: on one centerline (250 Kg ?) bomb rack and
four under-wing (50 Kg ?) bomb racks. In the cowl, the F version had a pair
of 7.9mm guns, the G a pair of 13mm guns. I can't find anything about the
air-to-ground rockets. And I assume the usual FW-190 Rustsatze kits (MK108
pods, etc.) used on the A versions would be available in the field for F
and G.
bino-- <II./JG54> bino.warbirds.org
Windle posted 02-24-99 05:02 PM ET (US)
I believe that the G model was a long range fighter bomber whose only
weaponry was two 20mm's in the wing roots. It had hardpoints under the wings
for a 75 gallon drop tank or 110 lb bombs and a fuselage rack for carrying
500lb and 2205lb bombs or even a 3980 pounder! Bad news is in order to carry
the 'big' bomb all of the other armament including all guns were stripped
from the plane and it took over a mile to get it off the ground. Some G
models were fitted with the MW 50 fuel injection system as well as nitrous
oxide injection.
The F model also had the wing hard points (four) and a centerline bomb
rack. Its primary armament was upgraded replacing the 7.9mm cowl-mounted
guns with 13mm guns to better complement the 20mm's in the wings. Also
the F-8 models could carry up to a 3,086 lb torpedo and some were outfitted
with 88mm 'projectile launching tubes' for tank busting.
-Windle-
8X VF-17 'The Jolly Rogers' 8X
funked posted 02-24-99 05:32 PM ET (US)
Thanks,
The 88mm tubes sound like what I had on the model. Sounds like fun if
we get some vehicles to shoot at.
The extra bombs would be very welcome right now. The 50kg eggs are great
for ack busting, four of them would be a nice complement to a 500kg on the
centerline.
Delta: The rocket propulsion testing was what happened to models that
weren't cosmetically perfect. Eventually a newer model would be built that
didn't have glue on the canopy, fingerprints on the paint job, etc. At this
time the older models were generally "retired" in a fiery manner.
bod posted 02-24-99 05:38 PM ET (US)
There where myriads of different variants of all the 190 models (U's
and R's and independent removal of cannons, guns and bomb-racks).
Basically the A3 was the first version using "factory conversion"
or Umruest-Bausaetze, therefore the U designation, (U1 U3 and U4). A3 was
a pure fighter, U1 and U3 were FB (U1 had guns removed and 500 kg bomb while
U3 had full armament and 250 kg bomb, some with 50 kg bombs in addition.
Armament was often removed) while the U4 was a reconnaisance fighter. Since
they all were factory conversions they could not be modified in the field.
The A4 only had U1 U3 and U8 (as i know of) but there were also a field
conversion, the R6. The R6 had a pair of 210mm rockets to break up allied
bomber groups (would be really cool to have in WB). The U8 (similar to A3-U3,
did however have very varied armament and bomb racks). A4-U8 must be a cool
plane in other words.
The A5 were build in 12 different versions based on the success of the
A3/A4 (fighter, jabo, rec ...). Many of these versions were only built in
small quantities, as small as only single prototypes. But They were all
U conversions not R as far as i know.
The F-1 was basically a modifyed A4 very similar to the A4-U3. The F-2
used the A-5 airframe but was nearly identical to the F-1. It seems that
they had 2x250kg bombs under the wings and a 500kg bomb in center.
The f-3 (A-6 airframe) had either one 250 kg bomb and 4? 50 kg bombs
(R1) or 2 30 mm MK 103 kannons instead of the ETC 50 bomb racks (R3). (seems
strange that it had much less bombs than the F-1/F-2, maybe due to increased
armor ?)
The F-8 - F10 used the A-8 airframe and similar weapon as the F-3 /R1.
(in addition to the 13mm instead of the 7.9 mm in thge nose)
The most common was the F-3/R3 with 30 mm cannons i think ??
Strange, it seems that the A3-A5 with its vareous factory conversions
and independant removal/addition of racks/guns was nearly just as well armed
as a FB as the F series. The F series did however have larger canopy, stronger
undercarriage and much improved bomb-releesing systems making it a better
FB overall (Much better armored as well?).
Also a lot of small quantity F models with torpedoes, missiles (fireing
backwards) etc were made.
Bod TWV
funked posted 02-24-99 06:04 PM ET (US)
Doh I answered my own question!
Check this out:
www.csd.uwo.ca/~pettypi/elevon/baugher_other/fw190.html#RTFToC13
Apparently the MK 103 were not used in service. But check out the Fw
190F-8/U1 - 1x500kg + 2x250kg bombs.
Other than the stores stations it appears to be identical to an A-8 but
without MW 50 (which WB doesn't model anyways), and minus the outboard cannons.
It also looks like there were a variety air-ground rockets available
from 1944 onward. |