What is WEP?
-
Last update - 29 January 1998
-

Posted by: tulcan

Posted on: 17:45:46 11/05/98

Message:

i dont know whats WEP good for :(

Posted by: miko-- 416 RCAF (JPC Squadron)

Posted on: 17:55:16 11/05/98

Message: A way to temporarily increase engine power beyong it's normal limits. Usually done on internal combustion aircraft engines through injecting water, but there were other ways.

Usually the increase in power caused engine to in a short while overheat, since the engines were air-cooled or radiators were too small for the engine size (vulnerable and not aerodynamic).

Use WEP when you need to climb fast or get away or catch up with someone. Remember that torque increases with engine power.

Accelerated (or any) stall with WEP on will quickly spin you out if you are not carefull.

Posted by: =para=

Posted on: 22:09:06 11/05/98

Message: Some performance measures like climb rate and acceleration are functions of "Excess power" which is the power left over after you subtract off the power required to maintain steady speed level flight at your current altitude.

Although the extra (for example) 10 to 15% (perhaps) power might not sound like much additional power, it might actually _double_ the amount of excess power.

So WEP can have a big effect on performance if you are near maximum speed or high and trying to climb, etc.

- Matt

WB: =para=

From: "=worr=" <worr@cwix.com>
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 00:45:43 -0600
 
I got to talking to =edge= about WEP on line and he encouraged me to post up
what we talked about, because it does not seem to be all that "common"
knowledge.
 
The best time to use WEP is for power and not for speed, if indeed you want
to use it wisely. With low power settings it will give you the most delta. I
would suggest anything below corner speed.
 
The analogy I use is pedaling a bicycle and pumping your legs with your arms
as you ride no hands. Up a hill this can really give you the extra boost to
get you over the hump. But straight and level and going fast you do very
little. Unless you really need the extra 5-8ias in level flight best stay
off it and save it for when you get slow and need to climb, or get fast
again.
 
Worr, out

From: William Thompson
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 01:44:41 -0600
 
My thoughts on WAR EMERGENCY POWER!
 
I use my WEP only during a combat engagement, when your life is riding those
horses behind the prop!
 
As =worr= wisely states, "The best time to use WEP is for power and not for
speed...." During any merge situation, when one might not be sure of one's
adversary's energy, use WEP. During any climbing maneuver, an immelman, or a
scissors, one would use WEP to boost the power up, and accentuate your climbing
capabilities with a few extra horsepower!
 
The time to use WEP is not when one is climbing to altitude (one should climb
away from the combat area; never climb to a fight). Climb to altitude near home,
and enter a fight from an advantage.
 
Personally, I rarely dive with WEP, but usually at idle throttle. I save my WEP
for after the dive, when I am ready to zoom climb or go vertical. When giving
chase to an opponent, WEP is usually an instinct, but one must give heed to the
aircraft's coolant temperature! With a hot engine, engine performance will be
worse than if you had never used WEP at all!
 
WEP is most valuable when used in the right place. Otherwise, it seems to me, it
can be the overriding factor in performance degredation, in the long run, and
the necessitator of having to land to cool down, or worse, be shot down because
of an engine overheating!
 
This is a good NG Thread. Thanks, =worr=, for posting. Anyone else have any WEP
thoughts?
=worr= wrote
 

 
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 10:18:56 +0200
 
William Thompson wrote:
 
> The time to use WEP is not when one is climbing to altitude (one should climb
> away from the combat area; never climb to a fight). Climb to altitude near home,
> and enter a fight from an advantage.
 
I disagree with this, not totally but somewhat. I constantly (but not
allways) use WEP when climbing from field. This depends on plane but
FW190 I mostly fly has enough WEP to get you above 2km before you notice
allmost any rise in temperature. And when in 3km I chop throttle down to
75% and engine cools down quickly. OK it is not best for fuel economy
but then you should take more fuel in the first place :)
>
> =worr= wrote:
> > The analogy I use is pedaling a bicycle and pumping your legs with your arms
> > as you ride no hands. Up a hill this can really give you the extra boost to
> > get you over the hump. But straight and level and going fast you do very
> > little. Unless you really need the extra 5-8ias in level flight best stay
> > off it and save it for when you get slow and need to climb, or get fast
> > again.
 
This is one thing I got wrong when I first though that WEP would be a
kick in the back when flying level at high speed. But then I checked few
performance pages and compared speeds with and without WEP and found out
how little difference there actually is. For acceleration it is a must.
 
--lu--
 

 
From: "=worr=" <worr@cwix.com>
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 09:12:18 -0600
 
>As =worr= wisely states, "The best time to use WEP is for power and not for
>speed...." During any merge situation, when one might not be sure of one's
>adversary's energy, use WEP. During any climbing maneuver, an immelman, or
a
>scissors, one would use WEP
 
Actually, in most gun defense moves you are trying to get them to blow past
you.
 
Therefore WEP is really inadvisable for a scissors. Same goes for barrels
and the defensive spiral.
 
Worr, out
 

 
Path: imolnews.icigames!not-for-mail
From: "=worr=" <worr@cwix.com>
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 09:13:31 -0600
 
>I disagree with this, not totally but somewhat. I constantly (but not
>allways) use WEP when climbing from field. This depends on plane but
>FW190 I mostly fly has enough WEP to get you above 2km before you notice
>allmost any rise in temperature. And when in 3km I chop throttle down to
>75% and engine cools down quickly. OK it is not best for fuel economy
>but then you should take more fuel in the first place :)
 
I do the same thing in a JUG for obvious reasons. :)
 
Worr

 
Path: imolnews.icigames!not-for-mail
From: William Thompson <wthompson@interconnect.net>
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 10:27:54 -0600
 
=worr= wrote:
 
> >As =worr= wisely states, "The best time to use WEP is for power and not for
> >speed...." During any merge situation, when one might not be sure of one's
> >adversary's energy, use WEP. During any climbing maneuver, an immelman, or
> a
> >scissors, one would use WEP
>
> Actually, in most gun defense moves you are trying to get them to blow past
> you.
>
> Therefore WEP is really inadvisable for a scissors. Same goes for barrels
> and the defensive spiral.
>
> Worr, out
 
The way I see it, if you are doing a scissors, there must be a high energy cons
rearing down your back side, and you are already in a lower E state. WEP during
a scissors will get you highers faster for the reversal, and saves a bit of
precious E you might need when you are done with the scissors, and the opponent
has blasted by you. It's not like you are going to be going any faster at the
top of a scissors with WEP, but it should accentuate your scissors. I disagree
that WEP is inadvisable for defensive maneuvers. As you said, WEP is helpful for
extra power. I use WEP during a rolling scissors or a high scissors, but I
suppose it would NOT be helpful in a flat scissors, when one would want to be
going nice a slowly to promote the overshot. I would say, use WEP when your
vector is perpendicular to the opponents attacking vector, trying to increase
the perpendicular component distance, while not putting more distance between
you and the opponent, parallel to his attack (forcing overshoot). This will make
him turn off sharper if he decides to follow your scissors (which will soon
place you in a higher E state if he bleeds his off), and if he extends, the WEP
will possibly let you keep enough E through the defense, to get the hell out.
 
As for the defensive spiral, i ALWAYS use WEP to get a better 'edge' on my
spiral climb! During a spiral, one is going to be at very low Energy, and will
need the power to achieve the most efficient climb throught the spiral.
 
baja--

 
From: William Thompson
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 10:33:33 -0600
 
Again, I stand by saving WEP for combat engagement. Wasting it before combat, seems to
me to be, well, wasteful, for lack of a better word. I believe you get 5 minutes? I
could be wrong there. I always try to climb to altitude away from the fight, and
engage from an altitude advantage. I usually throttle between 85 and 90% for climbs,
saving the engine for combat, as well. I don't know if this has any effect in
warbirds, but in WWII, most fighters seemed to not open the throttle until combat. To
me, it seems everyone in WarBirds takes off with the throttle set to 100% and never
change it until landing. Then again, you can't blow your coolant in WarBirds, so it
seems; one just overheats, thats all.
 
Alas, I must agree with you on non-combat use of WEP in the Focke-Wulfe 190. The dam
thing just lasts forever, and the engine never seems to overheat! I think that plane
has one of the best damned engines in warbirds! It can fly forever with no oil, and
WEP on! It seems to take about 10 minutes before seizing when you have an oil hit.
 
Lauri Uusitalo wrote:
 

 
From: William Thompson
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:15:36 -0600
Gentlemen:
 
After careful thought and consideration, I would like to recant my ideas of using
WEP during a scissors. After carefully reviewing when, if ever, i have used WEP
during a scissors maneuver, I cannot remember if I have or have not. Alas, the idea
is to force the overshoot, and slower velocities (not WEP) would lead to the
overshoot. However, in order to increase the defelection, WEP might be useful only
when your flight vector is perpendicular to the attackers line of fire (attacker
higher E) and the defenders movement is in an upwards direction (low E).
 
I stand by my use of WEP during the Spiral Climb.
 
I do not want to spread bad information, so please let me know your ideas on my
recanting use of WEP for scissors.
 
I believe, =worr=, that you opened yourself up to this question:
"What is a scissors, when is it useful, how many different types of scissors are
there, how do you do them?"
 
I want to hear the trainer's perspective. I could be doing the dam things wrong all
this time, anyhow.
 

 
From: "=worr="
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:17:33 -0600
 
>Again, I stand by saving WEP for combat engagement. Wasting it before
combat, seems to
>me to be, well, wasteful, for lack of a better word. I believe you get 5
minutes?
 
Based upon your assumption that would be correct. :)
 
But WEP expiration is based upon tempurature not time.
 
Worr

 
From: "=worr="
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:18:44 -0600
 
 
>As for the defensive spiral, i ALWAYS use WEP to get a better 'edge' on my
>spiral climb!
 
A spiral climb is not a defensive spiral.
 
Worr, out
 

 
From: "=worr="
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:46:27 -0600
 
>I believe, =worr=, that you opened yourself up to this question:
>"What is a scissors, when is it useful, how many different types of
scissors are
>there, how do you do them?"
 
Actually, I was saying any guns defense move so the question is much larger.
 
There is basically only one scissors. You can just point them in different
directions. ;)
 
Worr, out
 

 
From: lawrence@dsuper.net (Webs)
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:18:47 -0500
 
> >Again, I stand by saving WEP for combat engagement. Wasting it before
> combat, seems to
> >me to be, well, wasteful, for lack of a better word. I believe you get 5
> minutes?
>
> Based upon your assumption that would be correct. :)
>
> But WEP expiration is based upon tempurature not time.
 
Not entirely. The Spit, for example, has a limited WEP no matter the
temperature.
 
Webs, CO 101 Squadron, Chel HaAvir (virtual)
 

 
From: cuda@99th.org (Cuda)
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:16:18 -0600
 
>Not entirely. The Spit, for example, has a limited WEP no matter the
>temperature.
 
I think that is true for ALL warbirds aircraft. At least it always was and
I have seen NO indication that this should have changed.
 
cuda out
 
--
Cuda, CO 99th Dragons
99th Dragons: http://www.99th.org/
Cuda's WB Resources: http://www.99th.org/cuda/
Custom Gunsights, Warbirds Directory and much more!
 

 
From: random(at)wsu.edu
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: 22 Jan 1999 19:38:07 GMT
 
> In article <lawrence-2201991318480001@d22-ip108.mtl.dsuper.net>,
> lawrence@dsuper.net (Webs) wrote:
>
> >Not entirely. The Spit, for example, has a limited WEP no matter the
> >temperature.
>
> I think that is true for ALL warbirds aircraft. At least it always was and
> I have seen NO indication that this should have changed.
 
Really? I've never yet had WEP cut out on me before the little red "You
are about to melt your engine into a block of formless slag" light comes
on...
 
-puck- uses wep all too often
 

 
From: Lauri Uusitalo <luu@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 21:48:04 +0200
 
> > >Not entirely. The Spit, for example, has a limited WEP no matter the
> > >temperature.
> >
> > I think that is true for ALL warbirds aircraft. At least it always was and
> > I have seen NO indication that this should have changed.
>
> Really? I've never yet had WEP cut out on me before the little red "You
> are about to melt your engine into a block of formless slag" light comes
> on...
 
Sometimes when I am flying (FW190...) the "power meter" drops from top
red (full WEP) to about half red (half WEP?) ie still more than 100%. I
do not know what causes this 'cause temperature is still on green or
yellow. Perhaps alt has something to do with it ? Also sometimes WEP
drops off completely while flying, but as I can toggle it straight back
on, I think it has to do something with those keyboard gremlins...
 
--lu--
 

 
From: lawrence@dsuper.net (Webs)
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 15:55:50 -0500
 
 
> > > >Not entirely. The Spit, for example, has a limited WEP no matter the
> > > >temperature.
> > >
> > > I think that is true for ALL warbirds aircraft. At least it always was and
> > > I have seen NO indication that this should have changed.
> >
> > Really? I've never yet had WEP cut out on me before the little red "You
> > are about to melt your engine into a block of formless slag" light comes
> > on...
>
> Sometimes when I am flying (FW190...) the "power meter" drops from top
> red (full WEP) to about half red (half WEP?) ie still more than 100%. I
> do not know what causes this 'cause temperature is still on green or
> yellow. Perhaps alt has something to do with it ?
 
Yes, that's it.
 
Also sometimes WEP
> drops off completely while flying, but as I can toggle it straight back
> on, I think it has to do something with those keyboard gremlins...
 
Or overheating your engine....
 
Webs, CO 101 Squadron, Chel HaAvir (virtual)
 

 
From: Gary
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 18:22:26 -0500
 
=worr= wrote:
 
> >Again, I stand by saving WEP for combat engagement. Wasting it before
> combat, seems to
> >me to be, well, wasteful, for lack of a better word. I believe you get 5
> minutes?
>
> Based upon your assumption that would be correct. :)
>
> But WEP expiration is based upon tempurature not time.
>
> Worr
 
In the game temp not time does seem to be true, but in the real planes
wern't most WEP systems based on some kind of injection (alcohol, water,
NOS) setup. These systems would be time limited.
 

 
 
From: Michael Blotzer
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 20:35:10 +0000
 
> The analogy I use is pedaling a bicycle and pumping your legs with your =
arms
> as you ride no hands. Up a hill this can really give you the extra =
boost to
> get you over the hump. But straight and level and going fast you do =
very
> little.
 
Ah, Worr, PMJI, but the way you add extra power up a hill on a
bicycle is to keep yer hands on top of the handle bar, not on
the drops as this interferes with your breathing, loose grip
so your upper body doesn't tighten up, slide forward on the
seat and keep a nice steady spin (sometimes I slide back on
the saddle just for a change). If it gets really steep get out
of the saddle to give that extra burst of power, rocking the
bike between yer leags in rthym to the pedal strokes and
pulling up on the handlebars.
 
Whatever you do, ride within yerself and do NOT go anaerobic.
This is especially important for the long, 3 - 20+ mile
ascents where if you go anaerobic you die. Finally, finish
strong going over the top so you carry your momentum onto the
downhill for recovery.
 
Of course you need clipless pedals so you can properly spin.
 
<FS> Meatball <-- avid cyclist who often wishes he had a
hispano 20mm on the Cannondale to take out some of the traffic
morons
 

 
From: Michael Blotzer
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 20:35:15 +0000
 
> I disagree with this, not totally but somewhat. I constantly (but not
> allways) use WEP when climbing from field. This depends on plane but
> FW190 I mostly fly has enough WEP to get you above 2km before you =
notice
> allmost any rise in temperature. And when in 3km I chop throttle down =
to
> 75% and engine cools down quickly. OK it is not best for fuel economy
> but then you should take more fuel in the first place :)
 
But WEP is War Emergency Power. It is designed for extra boost
in combat. Shouldn't be wasted on climbout.
 
As I understand it, the time limit on WEP was due to the
adverse effect on the engine and had nothing to do with fuel
-- except for the nitro used by the FWs and water injection
for the corsair(?). Wasn't there a breakaway tag on some
throttles that was broken by going into WEP so the maintenance
crews knew what the pilot had done and could give extra
attention in maintenance?
 
<FS> Meatball
 

 
 
From: Wells Sullivan
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 20:41:12 -0500
Organization: iMagic Online
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <36A928B8.BE14B14C@iaw.com>
References: <789764$4l13@news.imagiconline.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: as3-12.iaw.on.ca
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
 
WEP does benefit acceleration and climb much more than top speed. It's use increases the energy gaining potential of the plane and should be used during any engagement.
As we found out in Pointblank, it could also benefit range. As it turned out
with the P-47's, we could increase our climb speed to compensate for the extra fuel consumption caused by using WEP (thus no loss in range), and still have a greater climb rate, so we reached cruising conditions sooner. This enabled a few extra miles of range.
 
=worr= wrote:
 

 
From: Erik Fritz <ekf10@csufresno.edu>
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 17:51:54 -0800
 
Michael Blotzer wrote:
 
<snip>
 
> <FS> Meatball <-- avid cyclist who often wishes he had a
> hispano 20mm on the Cannondale to take out some of the traffic
> morons
 
Wonder how long of a sustained burst you could have before the recoil kicked you into an involuntary reverse gear?
 
-iago- sometimes just can't help himself
 

 
From: random(at)wsu.edu (Raisuli)
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
 
> for the corsair(?). Wasn't there a breakaway tag on some
> throttles that was broken by going into WEP so the maintenance
> crews knew what the pilot had done and could give extra
 
Are you suggesting that some pilots might FAIL (accidently, of course) to
inform the crew if stress limits, Vmax, or any of the other myriad details
are exceeded/violated?
 
Perish the thought.
 
-puck- can't imagine something like that ever happening...
 

 
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 13:37:52 -0700
 
 
William Thompson wrote:
>
..snip.. When giving
> chase to an opponent, WEP is usually an instinct, but one must give heed to the
> aircraft's coolant temperature! With a hot engine, engine performance will be
> worse than if you had never used WEP at all!
>
 
Is this true? I've never noticed any difference in performance with a
hot engine vs. a cold engine in Warbirds. I know this is an effect in
"real life", but I didn't think WB did much in the engine modeling
department. After all, you can jump on the runway, flip on the engine,
and slam it to the stops with no problem.
 
Lepton
III./JG54
 

 
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 00:55:28 -0500
 
>I got to talking to =edge= about WEP
 
its =eadg= :)
 
Jester
 

 
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 20:33:33 GMT
 
On 22 Jan 1999 19:38:07 GMT, random@wsu.edu (Raisuli) wrote:
 
>>
>> >Not entirely. The Spit, for example, has a limited WEP no matter the
>> >temperature.
>>
>> I think that is true for ALL warbirds aircraft. At least it always was and
>> I have seen NO indication that this should have changed.
>
>Really? I've never yet had WEP cut out on me before the little red "You
>are about to melt your engine into a block of formless slag" light comes
>on...
>
>-puck- uses wep all too often
 
Really. If you put WEP off and cool the engine, you can of course use
WEP later, but eventually the time limit comes. WEP has limited time,
as there were some water or other fluid tank for it.
 
What I have always thougt, that the time limits would be same as in
1.11, meaning 5 mins generally, 10 mins for 109 & 190 at least. But
now that I think it, I really don't know.
 

 
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 20:55:14 -0500
 
But is performance loss due to overheating modeled in WB? I've never
noticed any. All I've seen is shutdown of the WEP when the engine
gets hot.
 
Muddy
 

 
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 21:09:55 -0500
 
You can bet the guy chasing you is using his WEP and gaining on you.
 
Basicly, I use WEP when engaged, period. I turn it off when I'm
clear. The whole time it's on it's adding E to your plane like a
battery charger. E is life. I only chop it when I find it necessary
to slow or maintain a speed as in a dive or staying below compression
speed. It's quicker and easier to bleed excess E than it is to
accumulate it when you need it. When it gets too hot, it's time to
disengage. Another thing, above 15 to 20k it's effect is minimal.
 
Muddy
 

 
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 21:16:08 -0500
 
I've seen a chart somewhere that list's the WEP duration for every
plane that has WEP. There is a time limit independant of the temp.
When you overheat and wep shuts off, it will work later. When you get
the message "wep limit reached" or something like that you have no
more period. I believe the FW had the longest WEP, 15 minutes comes
to mind. Other planes had only a few minutes.
 
Muddy
 

 
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 21:23:45 -0500
 
According to Chuck Yeager, as soon as the enemy was sighted fighter
pilots firewalled their machines and left them there until the fight
was over. They routinely ignored all the guidlines with reference to
babying the engine in any way. In his words, 'Hell, all combat is an
emergency' or words to that effect.
 
Muddy
 

 

Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 01:25:27 -0600
 
Terry Waters <terryw@ascenture.com> wrote in message
news:78gl4l$7611@news.imagiconline.com...
 
>According to Chuck Yeager, as soon as the enemy was sighted fighter
>pilots firewalled their machines and left them there until the fight
>was over. They routinely ignored all the guidlines with reference to
>babying the engine in any way. In his words, 'Hell, all combat is an
>emergency' or words to that effect.
>
>Muddy
 
That may be an exageration.
 
Combat could last longer, and unlike WB planes you can do every move full
power in a real air craft.
 
But as to the original question, yes there was a gate you broke through to
get WEP so that the crews knew you hit it and so that you wouldn't use it
carelessly.
 
Worr, out
 

 
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 01:28:47 -0600
 
>> But WEP expiration is based upon tempurature not time.
>>
>> Worr
>
>In the game temp not time does seem to be true, but in the real planes
>wern't most WEP systems based on some kind of injection (alcohol, water,
>NOS) setup. These systems would be time limited.
 
Yes...I didn't state this clearly. WEP expires according to time. The engine
expires according to temperature.
 
What is odd is that some wep systems kick back when you overheat them, while
others, such as in the FTD just burn out the engine if left on.
 
Worr, out
 

 

Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 04:16:25 -0800
 
If I'm not mistaken,
 
Using a Bf109f-4 [Franz] you should have 2X the WEP of other fighters , its single cannon lasts as long as its Guns & has one of the the highest level speed & climb rates.....
 
If you're flying the Bf109g-2 [Gustav] the reason your engine could be
lasting so long after battle damage might be due to the different oiling
scheme necessary for an inverted V design, BTW it's also a negative G
powerplant.... Just makes ya wonder what it would be like flying one thru a
hanger inverted, doesn't it?..... Amost did it once over in Air Warrior,
but hooked the tailwheel on the top of the door opening exiting out the
other side :-)
 
Slydr
 

 

Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 19:48:18 -0500
 
Terry Waters wrote:
 
> speed. It's quicker and easier to bleed excess E than it is to
> accumulate it when you need it. When it gets too hot, it's time to
> disengage. Another thing, above 15 to 20k it's effect is minimal.
 
Depending on the system the plane was set up with it should be more
effective at high alt, but maybe not in game terms. NOS and cranking up
the turbocharger would be those kinds of systems. The water and alcohol
injection on the other hand would not change things as much as they
would at low alt.
 
Havloc
 

 
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 18:41:25 -0600
 
=worr= wrote:
 
> >> But WEP expiration is based upon tempurature not time.
> >>
> >> Worr
> >
> >In the game temp not time does seem to be true, but in the real planes
> >wern't most WEP systems based on some kind of injection (alcohol, water,
> >NOS) setup. These systems would be time limited.
>
> Yes...I didn't state this clearly. WEP expires according to time. The engine
> expires according to temperature.
>
> What is odd is that some wep systems kick back when you overheat them, while
> others, such as in the FTD just burn out the engine if left on.
 
Really? I haven't ever seen this in the FTD, and I fly it a lot. When the
plane overheats, the WEP kicks off, when engines are cool, I can kick it back
in. I have never had an engine fail because of WEP. Of course, maybe I don't
live long enough. :-)
 
warmut
 
Doug Hansen
 

 
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 10:42:19 +0100
 
> Also sometimes WEP
> drops off completely while flying, but as I can toggle it straight back
> on, I think it has to do something with those keyboard gremlins...
 
Let me guess.. do you have a MS Sidewinder joystick? Well I have, and
it's notable feature is that thw throttle doesn't go all the way up (to
100%) but a bit lower.. Which at times causes the WEP to cut out. Using
WBSTICK helps this a bit, but it still happens occasionally:)
 
I found this helpful because it helped me conserve WEP when I forgot to
turn it off.
 
Czech 6!
 
Jakub
czech- (249th RAF)
 

 
Newsgroups: warbirds.training
Subject: Re: On Using War Emergency Power wisely
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 12:46:19 +0200
 
 
"czech- (Jakub Uchytil)" wrote:
>
> > Also sometimes WEP
> > drops off completely while flying, but as I can toggle it straight back
> > on, I think it has to do something with those keyboard gremlins...
>
> Let me guess.. do you have a MS Sidewinder joystick? Well I have, and
> it's notable feature is that thw throttle doesn't go all the way up (to
> 100%) but a bit lower.. Which at times causes the WEP to cut out. Using
> WBSTICK helps this a bit, but it still happens occasionally:)
 
No I do not have MS Sidewinder but a good single pot as a throttle. And
actually I have not thought about this possibility as normally throttle
stays at 100% when full. But there might be that teeny weeny drop to
99.5% which I can not see but it is enough to drop WEP off. Thx czech!
 
--lu--