I am most
grateful to the editor of the magazine of the Inland Waterways Assoc. of
Ireland, Mr. Brian J. Goggin (www.iwai.ie)
who gave permission for the article on the Clodiagh to be re-produced on our
website. The article first appeared in the Winter 2002 edition of the
magazine.
NEWSLETTER OF THE
INLAND WATERWAYS ASSOCIATION OF IRELAND
The Clodiagh: the
forgotten navigation
Brian J Goggin
The compilers of the Euromapping Irish
waterways map didn't miss much. Their map shows, for example, theBride,
the Castlemaine, the former Bridgetown Canal and the position of the tiny
Broharris, none of them amongst the most-used waterways today. But the map
doesn't show the Clodiagh, a tributary of the Suir. The town that stands
on the Clodiagh is shown: Portlaw, about two thirds of the way upriver from
Waterford to Carrick-on-Suir. If you're on the N24 Limerick to Waterford road,
and you want to go to somewhere on the Cork side of Waterford city, you can
cross the Suir at Carrick or at Fiddown and follow a minor road to the south of
the river. The surface is surprisingly good: it was improved for the Tour de
France some years ago. But there is one humpbacked bridge, about half way
between Fiddown and Kilmeaden, and it crosses the Clodiagh, a river that was
crucial to one of the most extraordinary industrial empires of the south of
Ireland. Turn westward off the road and you'll find yourself in Portlaw.
Portlaw's beginnings
Portlaw is a small town in Co
Waterford, on the river Clodiagh, a tributary of the Suir. It was developed in
the nineteenth century by the Quaker Malcolmson family, and may be the only
planned industrial town in the republic of Ireland. At its peak, it had over
4,000 inhabitants and, by 1844, over 1,800 people worked at the plant.
The
main building, minus top two stories
David Malcolmson, born in Lurgan in
1765, came to Clonmel in 1784 to work for Sarah Grubb at the Anner Mills. After
some years, during which he held a number of different jobs, he went into the
milling trade with his brother John; they also had an interest in the coal trade
and boatbuilding.
According to Desmond G Neill
In 1819 he brought three of his sons, Joseph, Joshua and John into
partnership in the firm, now
named David Malcolmson & Sons.
In 1822 the Malcolmsons leased a mill
at Pouldrew, which brought their operations further down the Suir, nearer
Waterford. They decided to diversify, and in 1825 they built a cotton mill
nearby at Mayfield, Portlaw, where there was a disused ironworks and where the
river had been made navigable for barges of 20 river had been made navigable for
barges of 20 tons. Five storeys of the original seven-storey cotton mill remain
today.
The importance of
water
It was the Clodiagh that first
attracted the Malcolmsons to Portlaw. Central to the operation was sophisticated
use of the waters of the Clodiagh. A weir, with a fish-pass, diverted water to
power three 30' water-wheels and to provide water for the town and the mill:
according to Bill Irish
Water was diverted with ingenuity from a sluice on the river through the
millpond, and underground culverts directed it into a huge water-wheel
which provided the motive power for the pumping plant. From the plant,
water was pumped through pipes uphill for half a mile to a small pond
153ft above the factory roof, which gave a magnificent gravitational fall
to feed the factory operations, the fire hydrant reservoir in the mill parapet,
and freshwater pumps in the
village.
Water that had passed the water-wheels
fed a half-mile stretch of canal, which rejoined the Clodiagh downstream and was
used to carry goods to and from the mill. The canal ran under the factory
receiving-house and (according to Bill Irish) it "intensified the fall in
the head-race".
The Clodiagh to the left and the canal
to the
right,
from the town bridge
Bill Irish says
For the cotton factory alone over 60 seagoing vessels of 100–150 tons and
150 open boats of 30–40
tons made passage between Waterford and Portlaw annually.
He suggests that John Skipton Mulvaney
or William Dargan may have designed the canal system. The canal and the remains
of a lock are still to be seen and the canal is navigable, at least by small
boats, up to the village. The Malcolmsons were also involved in the River Suir
Navigation Company, which enabled 300-ton vessels to reach Carrick-on-Suir, with
teams of twelve horses pulling pairs of flatboats further upstream to Clonmel.
Portlaw: planned
town
The Malcolmsons built several
streets of houses for their workers, many of which still have their distinctive
round roofs, which were covered with tarred calico. The calico was produced at
the mill and the tar was a byproduct of the firm's gas works, the town being one
of the first with gas public lighting. These roofs were later copied in Belfast
and on the Ruhr. The Malcolmsons provided a school, with seven teachers at
its peak (and with Bible-based but non-sectarian education), a hospital, shops
(with lower prices than those in the surrounding areas), a bakery, a Provident
Society, a Tontine Club, evening classes, a Literary Society, a Philharmonic
Society .... The Portlaw planned town may have influenced the design of
Bessbrook in Co Armagh, which in turn influenced George Cadbury's plans for
Bournville and Titus Salt's model village of Saltaire. Portlaw is thus extremely
important, not just to Ireland but to all of these islands.
The Malcolmson
empire
The Malcolmsons also owned the
Neptune ship-building yard in Waterford, where the Phoenix was built. As
well as the River Suir Navigation Co, they were involved with the Waterford
Commercial Steam Navigation Co, the Cork Steam Ship Company, the London–St
Petersburg Line, the London and Limerick Steamship Company and others. Bill
Irish says that by 1858 they had 70 ships registered in Waterford, with
interests in many others elsewhere. Joseph Malcolmson (of the second generation)
was a director of the National Irish Bank and a shareholder in several railways
and in coalmines on the Ruhr. In Portlaw, operations expanded from spinning and
weaving to include bleaching, dyeing and printing. But Joseph died in 1858
and his widow withdrew her share of the capital from what had remained a
partnership, by then called Malcolmson Brothers. He was the oldest brother, and
the next oldest two, Joshua and John, were involved in the business, as their
father David had intended. There were three younger brothers, whom David had
expected to "strike out on their own with capital provided for them",
as Bill Irish puts it. But when Joseph died, only fourteen years after his
father, William, the fifth brother, took over as senior partner. Under William's
stewardship the business suffered one setback after another. There were unwise
investments — the Lax Weir in Limerick, a turf briquette factory in
Castleconnell, the Limerick–Castleconnell railway and its extension to a pier
at Killaloe — some of which were William's private investments, outside the
partnership. He was involved in the Galway Line, seeking to provide a
transatlantic mail service, and the partnership ran the London–New York Line.
Then the American Civil War hit the cotton business, the foundation of it all.
Malcolmsons' bankers went bankrupt, with £2,000,000 of Malcolmsons' money.
John, one of the three older brothers, withdrew his capital. Joseph's son David,
one of the partners, died, and his widow withdrew their son's capital. According
to Desmond G Neill, that son died at the age of 20 after working as a fisherman
in Dunmore East.
Mayfield
House, which was used for offices until the
1990s.
The tannery
The Malcolmsons' firm collapsed
in 1877. The Portlaw Spinning Company took over the mill, but it failed in 1897.
By 1910 the town was desolate, but in 1934 it entered its second period of
growth. Portlaw, in other words, was at the centre of not just one but two
remarkable Irish industries, in two successive centuries, and the site has
buildings from both eras. Irish Tanners Ltd took over the site and built a
tannery that, at one stage, was the largest in Europe, employing 600 people. The
tannery too used the Clodiagh's water, this time for treating the hides. Tanning
was a seven-day process, with the hides suspended in pits on chains or spikes,
and shaken every day. There are still traces of the bogeys used to move the
hides around the yard. Sand was brought up the canal in the tannery days.
Argentina could ship leather to Britain at the same price as Portlaw could buy
in untreated hides, so Portlaw had to concentrate on fine leather, including
wet-look leather. Some of the company's customers preferred leather from Portlaw
to that from the other tanneries in the group; it was suggested that something
in the quality of the Clodiagh's water made it particularly suitable for
treating hides.
The tannery was closed in 1985, although it had two years' orders at the time,
and some employees moved to other plants in the group at Carrick-on-Suir, Gorey
and Dungarvan. Mayfield House, the principal Malcolmson residence on the site,
was used as offices by the tannery and for about ten years afterwards, but is
now a ruin. The former Mill Pond of 3.65 acres, and an extension of 0.69 acres,
were filled with waste during the tannery years, and in 1995 the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) found all sorts of chemical nasties in it. EPA sampling
points on the river and canal at the town bridge showed decreased pollution
after the tannery closed, but the landfill site is probably still contaminated,
and it is known that other chemicals were used or stored on the site.
Portlaw today
In describing somewhere like
Portlaw, it is all too easy to think of it solely in terms of its past,
forgetting that people still live there today. But if the Portlaw National
School's website is anything to go by, http://homepage.eircom.net/~portlawns/
the town did not go to sleep when the tannery closed. Many schools have
websites and a surprising number are of waterways interest, but this is one of
the best, with both a solid core of historical material and much modern news and
information about Portlaw. The school's pupils and staff, and in particular
whoever manages the website, are to be congratulated.
According to the Munster Express (03/08/01),
Waterford County Council appreciates the value of the Clodiagh navigation:
The unique planned industrial town of Portlaw is to benefit from the
re-opening of the canal bank walk overlooking the Clodiagh River.
The existing stairway to the canal bank is to be repaired and restored
to create a walkway and viewing area. The plan includes the planting of a
wildflower meadow and the lowering of the stone wall along Bridge
Street to open up views to
the surrounding hills.
The Council planned to spend £100,000
on the project. Visiting the town today, you can see the bridge, canal and
(downstream) what may be the remains of the lock: one pair of gates forming a
sharp V. The mill and tannery are on private property, although the entrance,
with its lodge and wheel-operated gates, is visible. In fact the past is all
around in Portlaw, from the layout of the streets to the remarkable roofs.
The threat to the
weir
But in a sense the most
important aspect of Portlaw, the basis of the Malcolmsons' operation, is
the water power of the Clodiagh, diverted to the mill complex by the weir at the
upriver end of the complex. That weir supplied the canal, the water-wheels, the
factory and tannery and the town. And it is now under threat. At present, the
weir has no sluice-gates and the water gushes out into the Clodiagh. It is said
that salmon are unable to swim against it, which is scarcely surprising.
However, when the gates were working, excess water went over the weir to the
river, and it is said that salmon were able to leap up it. There is also a
fish-pass. But the weir needs somebody to look after it: to clear debris, open
and close the gates from time to time, perhaps — the Department of the Marine
suggests — even to deter poachers from time to time. The weir itself also
needs some repair. The Southern Regional Fisheries Board, supported by the
Department of the Marine, proposes to construct a "River By-pass channel to
facilitate migratory fish passage", to allow salmon to travel upstream.
This bypass would be upstream of the weir; it would cause the channel and weir
below the diversion point to dry out in average flow, although the channel would
fill, and, flow over the weir, in flood conditions. No water would enter the
tailrace except in high floods; it would continue to receive water by seepage
from the river and by "tidal intrusion". The Board suggests that, if
necessary, a pipe could take a gravity feed from the river below the weir to the
tailrace; alternatively, a small piped supply could be fed from above the
diversion to the headrace, allowing intermittent operation of a demonstration
millwheel. The owner of the site is opposed to this, and fears that the canal
might be permanently deprived of water instead of being restored. The SRFB got
planning permission; a local
Fine Gael councillor, Paudie Coffey,
and the Heritage Council, have submitted objections to An Bord Pleanála. The
Heritage Council has also been a partner in preparing a conservation plan for
Portlaw (expected soon). Cllr Coffey says that the weir bypass will jeopardise
part of Portlaw’s unique heritage and seriously affect the canal and mill
race, which are both listed as protected structures under the Local
Government Act 1999. He is quoted as saying "The canal and the mill
have a deeprooted affinity and attachment with the community." The marquis
of Waterford was quoted in The Irish Times as condemning the
submission of objections, saying that salmon are more important than industrial
heritage. The account in The Irish Times did not say anything
about the ownership of the salmon fishing rights. I have spoken to the
Marquis, who confirms that he owns them. He says that he is acting in the
national interest.
Comment
Salmon are important, yes, but
Portlaw is unique. Removing its fons et origo, its water supply, the
reason for the development of this extraordinary town, would be a very serious
step. This is surely one of the richest industrial heritage sites in Ireland,
and one with a strong waterways connection; it is surely worthwhile seeking
alternatives to the drying out of the weir.
Sources
Tom Hunt Portlaw, County
Waterford 1825–1876: Portrait of an Industrial Village and its Cotton
Industry, Maynooth Studies in Irish Local History Number 33, Irish
Academic Press, 2000, 0-7165-2722-7
Desmond G Neill Portlaw: A
Nineteenth Century Quaker Enterprise Based on a Model Village,
Historical Committee of the Religious Society of Friends in Ireland, 1992,
0-9519870-2-X
Bill Irish Shipbuilding in
Waterford 1820–1882: A historical, technical and pictorial study,
Wordwell, 2001, 1-869857-50-X
History section of the website of
Portlaw National School http://homepage.eircom.net/~portlawns/
Site visit, arranged by Rosaleen Miller
of IWAI Heritage & Conservation Committee, and discussions with Victor
Bowers and Mikey O'Shea
Documents supplied by Waterford County
Council
Telephone conversations with Cllr
Paudie Coffey and the Marquis of Waterford